Skip to main content
  1. Article Reviews/

Particle Filtering Tractography

Reference: Girard, G., Whittingstall, K., Deriche, R., & Descoteaux, M. (2014). Towards quantitative connectivity analysis: reducing tractography biases. Neuroimage, 98, 266-278.

Reviewed by Jeremi Levesque. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811914003541

·1 min

Abstract #

Quantitative measures of connectivity are biased by erroneous streamlines produced by tractography algorithms:

  • Streamline count (density)
  • Avg length
  • Spatial extent (volume) Solutions proposed to reduce the biases in the streamline distribution:
  1. Optimize tractography params in terms of connectivity
  2. Relax stopping criterion with novel probabilistic stopping criterion and particle filtering method (using partial volume estimation maps).

Introduction #

Bundles hard to track:

  • Bundles positioned in partial volume with CSF: streamline propagation is more likely to be stopped (e.g. CC, fornix).
  • Narrow bundles: they are more likely to be affected by error in the tracking mask => stopping the streamline propagation.
  • Curved bundles: noise can make the tracking direction harder to follow in curved regions (since discrete steps are taken in the estimated tangent direction) Length of bundles bias their reconstruction:
  1. Seeding from WM increases the density (more seeds positioned in longer bundles overall)
  2. Longer bundles are harder to completely recover because of several premature stops => lower density of streamlines. Reconstruction biases: stopping/masking criterions, tractography parameters.